Let’s try TV in the EFL class!

By Fabiola Reyes, fabirey@ula.ve and

 

 

 

Carmen Chacón, ctchacon@cantv.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you are teaching English in a foreign context you know how difficult it is for students to be exposed to authentic input outside the class. Based on this reality and taking advantage of the advance of satellite technology, we decided to incorporate TV watching as part of the curriculum. As English learners we recognize that TV watching is a useful source of input that helps get the gist of messages from context while learning real-world vocabulary, pronunciation, and culture. So, why not using cable TV—which nowadays is accessible to many homes—to encourage your students to listen to English through movies, sitcoms, videos, and other shows of their preference?

 

Thinking about the lack of input outside the class, a year ago we started a project in collaboration using cable TV to provide our students with such input out of the classroom. We thought that it was a challenging activity but at the same time was innovative to have them develop the habit of watching TV at home as a task to improve their listening and vocabulary skills. To achieve this goal, we needed the students to keep a record of their listening and the time they spent watching TV, so we required them to write a weekly journal to summarize the activity. Thus, we negotiated with the students and set some guidelines they needed to follow. We wanted them to be at ease and get used to watching TV as part of their daily routine, as a fun activity; therefore, we let them know that the journals’ goal was content rather than accuracy.

 

Getting Started

We gave students freedom to select their favorite programs, the time when they would watch them, and the choice to join their classmates for the activity. Besides, we asked them to watch at least eight hours a week. They were required to hand in the journal with entries including the name of the program, channel, schedule, summary of the plot and major characters, and a brief comment on them. At first, it was not easy to get them accustomed to the activity, since they wanted to understand everything, but it was not possible to do so as they were not trained, and they did not know what strategies to use. They complained, so we supported them with written feedback and strategy instruction.

 

Strategy Training

We followed Oxford’s (1990) classification of leaning strategies and explicitly instructed the students about metacognitive strategies (paying attention to the way they got the message), compensation strategies (how they overcame limitations in listening and writing), affective strategies (how they encouraged themselves or lowered their anxiety), and cognitive strategies (taking notes, summarizing, repeating, etc.). They seemed relieved and a few weeks later their writing entries showed improvement and their testimonies suggested that they were getting more comfortable in doing the activity and some of them came up with strategies that reflected their individual differences and learning styles.

 

Weekly Feedback

We read the journals within a week and returned them to the students with written feedback about content and supportive comments. In our weekly review, we kept track of the major accuracy problems (e.g. subject-verb agreement, verb tense, gerund after prepositions) to take care of them in the Grammar class, which the students were also taking.

 

From the experience we have described, we encourage other EFL teachers to use cable TV as a handy source that may help students with their listening skills in the first place, but also with vocabulary and writing like in our students’ case. Through this experience we realized that the students gradually increased their skills to comprehend English and write extensively, making progress not only in content (sense and coherence) but also in accuracy. In addition, they learned about cultural aspects embedded in the social context of each program; no doubt television is an authentic source of input that provides aural stimuli, nonverbal cues, and real life vocabulary.

 

Reference

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York,  NY: Newbury House/Harper & Row. 

 

 

Carmen Chacón is an associate professor of English at the University of Los Andes Táchira, Venezuela.  She holds a PhD from The Ohio State University in Foreign/Second Language Education. Her research interests include critical practice in language teaching, TEFL methodology, and teachers’ self-efficacy.  Her research has appeared in The TESOL NNESTS Newsletter and the Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education.

 

Fabiola Reyes is an assistant professor of English at the University of Los Andes Táchira, Venezuela.  Her research interests include TEFL methodology and academic writing. For the last two years, she has incorporated TV watching and journaling into her English Writing class.

 

Video News February 2006 Volume 17 Number 1: Table of Contents